I don't know if this is a blueprint issue, a labeling issue, a legal issue, or?
Here's an example of a label that makes me larn Grrrrrrrrrrr:
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 tin of Campbell's soup (yum, yum):

Ah, it contains 540mL of soup:

Grrrrrrrrrrr! The ingredients are listed based on 250mL:

Why aren't the ingredients listed based on 540mL (the tin contents) or fifty-fifty 270mL (half a can)?
For about argue close soups, non but Campell's, last the same cistron measuring mismatch.
Grrrrrrrrrrr!
At to the lowest degree the label is printed using FM screening. :-)
Here's an example of a label that makes me larn Grrrrrrrrrrr:
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 tin of Campbell's soup (yum, yum):

Ah, it contains 540mL of soup:

Grrrrrrrrrrr! The ingredients are listed based on 250mL:

Why aren't the ingredients listed based on 540mL (the tin contents) or fifty-fifty 270mL (half a can)?
For about argue close soups, non but Campell's, last the same cistron measuring mismatch.
Grrrrrrrrrrr!
At to the lowest degree the label is printed using FM screening. :-)
Comments
Post a Comment